Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NAG is saying if the court were to rule that  wayfarer had to pay those fees (which sounds unlikely and why others pointed out would be very limited in scope), it would require lively’s team to release details on what they charged and how they got there (how many people were working on this issue, what they were charging etc.) and that widely likely would not want that information release because then people could extrapolate and it would lead to a whole bunch of headlines about what she actually paid these lawyers. [/quote]

I don't get this because this is always true for lawsuits. Had Lively gone to trial and won, she would have had to submit her attorneys fees to the court for damages. This is a standard thing.

The attorneys fees for just Baldoni's lawsuit against her will be just a fraction of what she paid total, so it's unlikely to be an embarrassing number. Especially since her team replied heavily on work by amicus briefs for the 47.1 motion, and Lively didn't pay for those amicus briefs. So if anything this stands to change the narrative that she spent 30 million on legal fees -- the number she would be claiming for the 47.1 motion would be only a small fraction of whatever her total number is.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics