Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Women should be able to abort only if the father consents, but a woman shouldn't be able to kill a man's baby because she has a change of heart after consensual intercourse. [/quote]

Only if the man agrees to gestate it in his own body for 9 months. Then he has a say. Otherwise no. He’s not putting himself at risk for potential death or disfigurement or health problems so he isn’t the one with veto power. [/quote]

Surely the life of a child is infinitely more valuable than the inconvenience of carrying a fetus for nine months.  On what planet do we equate human life with a temporary medical condition?

If the woman prefers not to risk those complications, she should not engage in intercourse and risk creating a baby she does not want. [/quote]

Sometimes she does not willfully engage.[/quote]

And sometimes she desperately wants that baby, but finds out after getting pregnant that having that baby will kill or permanently disfigure her.
Pregnancy isn’t just an “inconvenience” for some women.  If you are fortunate to have not been confronted with this decision in your life, consider yourself very lucky.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics