Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Women should be able to abort only if the father consents, but a woman shouldn't be able to kill a man's baby because she has a change of heart after consensual intercourse. [/quote]

Only if the man agrees to gestate it in his own body for 9 months. Then he has a say. Otherwise no. He’s not putting himself at risk for potential death or disfigurement or health problems so he isn’t the one with veto power. [/quote]

Surely the life of a child is infinitely more valuable than the inconvenience of carrying a fetus for nine months.  On what planet do we equate human life with a temporary medical condition?

If the woman prefers not to risk those complications, she should not engage in intercourse and risk creating a baby she does not want. [/quote]

Ok old white dude. [/quote]
Eh. Don’t feed the forced birther trolls. Women’s lives, work and accomplishments are worth nothing to them. Most of them stopped developing emotionally around age 11 and live in a world of fairy tales where men are manly and women are there for the men.

Just remember that the GOP, with Project 2025, will force women out of the workplace and into as many children as she is forced to have by her particular circumstances. “Traditional” womanhood is a feature of fascism and it’s one these control freaks are most excited about. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics