Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I hope the press corp continues to ask these questions. [/quote]

Not if they work for Bezos Washington Post. The WaPo just ran an article that sows doubt on the validity of the signature and provided blatant cover for MAGA. The post is all-in for Trump. They are truly shameless. [/quote]

Revolting. We cancelled our sub in November after decades. [/quote]

We had kept Sunday, but now we’re just done. [/quote]

I’m op and just searched it in Apple News, which sometimes shows WaPo.

This truly is appalling. I have no expert analysis and the signature is his. I’ve never seen a signature less varied. From WaPo for those who can’t see it:

[b]Is the signature Trump’s? Epstein birthday book feeds speculation. [/b]   
“The Washington Post reviewed more than a dozen versions of his signatures, many of which Trump included in his book, “Letters to Trump.” Several of them do bear some resemblance to the one that is included in Epstein’s book, with a long line drawn on the final D in his first name. The signature, which reads only “Donald,” is distinct from how he signed more formal documents that included his full name, but he often used only his first name in more informal correspondence.

Several forensic analysts who reviewed the signatures said they could not determine if it was Trump’s signature.”[/quote]

Horse manure!  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics