Reply to So, what is wrong with Hardy?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "So, what is wrong with Hardy?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Because they know that the OOB numbers will increase right along with the IB numbers.

If DCPS were truly interested in Hardy becoming a predominantly IB school, they would reduce enrollment to give the grass roots IB recruitment effort a shot at succeeding.

The Hardy proposition is a bait-and-switch for IB families.[/quote]

It's not a bait and switch - it's a prisoner's dilemma.    If IB parents send their children to Hardy, they will crowd out OOB families, just like they did at Deal.  Then IB families will have what they want - an almost-all-IB school.   But if they don't come, then of course OOB families will attend.  DCPS cannot and should not let the school sit empty in case IB families decide to show.  There is no nefarious plot or mysterious game at play.  If IB families want an IB school, all they have to do is send their kids to that school.[/quote]

Mann parent here. I agree with this assessment. If IB attend, OOB will be squeezed out and it will be an IB school. While IB students stay away, the school can and should be filled. [/quote]

No, it's not a prisoner's dilemma.  It's a bait-and-switch.

DCPS plans to admit,  via the lottery, as many OOB kids into Hardy as can be accommodated without hurting the school.  As has been argued before, one measure of "hurting the school" is the FARMs rate.  FARMs rates much higher than 50% hurt schools.  An increase in the size of (non-FARM) IB enrollment will allow DCPS to admit more (mostly FARM) OOB kids through the lottery.

Many Hardy supporters have a vision of a high-functioning MS of 350 or so kids, mostly IB, that rivals Deal and has the scores to prove it, largely due to a reduction in the FARMs rate to 20% or so, all while being only 1/4 the size of Deal.

That is an unlikely outcome.  More likely is an MS approaching 600 kids that remains lackluster compared to Deal because, despite recruiting many IB families, the FARMs rate was kept at 50% by DCPS.

If Hardy were to gain popularity among IB families, how could DCPS justify not growing enrollment until the building is bursting at the seams?
[/quote]

Is that what they did at Deal? (Spoiler alert: no.)[/quote]

Please enlighten us, PP.

What was the process by which Deal grew to be almost 1,250 kids, yet still 30% OOB (and 21% FARMs)?

How is Hardy insulated from a similar, but potentially much worse, outcome?[/quote]

I think you missed the point: that there is no reason that Hardy can't become just as good as Deal.   The only thing keeping it from being that good is the refusal of IB parents to send their children there.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics