Reply to Bowe Bergdahl

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Bowe Bergdahl"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Astounding.

There were a few men killed looking for Bergdahl. That has not been debated. Men in those units came forward and said out of the six reported, three were not a result. That was good of these soldiers, and it seems liberals here are willing to take the at their word, as I've read

The men in Bergdahll's unit came forward and stated that he went AWOL. They were there, they knew him, and they expected it based on his prior questions to fellow soldiers. This bit of information, liberals here are not willing to consider factual. Not surprising.

Rice came forward saying Bergdahl served honorably. Obama and those in his administration did not expect these soldiers to talk, let alone to conservative media. They clearly do not understand that a good soldier would not allow the families of those killed in action to live on not knowing the truth. Bad miscalculation on the administration's part. Bad.

The Taliban had no reason not to behead him, unless they were getting something from holding him. He was reportedly allowed to carry a gun with them, and shot with them. If you don't think that's unusual, I would advise you to speak to men who were there. 
[/quote]

People get killed during wars, that's why they suck!  You don't leave anyone behind or is that what you want to do in the future?  Perhaps you'd like to be the final arbiter of who is rescued and who gets left behind. [/quote]

It's not about the leaving or not leaving behind, though I know that's a huge liberal talking point meant to distract from the lies. The soldiers in his unit spoke out because Susan Rice lied about him serving honorably.

[/quote]

So then you are fine with the release?  You are simply opposed to the phrase used by Susan Rice. She is correct on that point. As of this moment he has served honorably. The rest is just scuttlebutt. There's always scuttlebutt.   The military runs on scuttlebutt. The Chiefs and Master Sergeants use it all the time to keep the junior enlisted confused and submissive.  Thankfully in addition to scuttlebutt the military also has the UCMJ. At present and until the UCMJ has decided differently, Susan Rice is correct, Sgt. Bergdahl has served honorably. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics