Reply to Dave Grohl, sooo disappointed (had a baby outside of his marriage)

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Dave Grohl, sooo disappointed (had a baby outside of his marriage)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]From 2012: Courtney Love Accuses Dave Grohl of Hitting on Frances Bean Cobain

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/courtney-love-accuses-dave-grohl-of-hitting-on-frances-bean-cobain-61949/[/quote]

Seems plausible.

Musician/celeb likes younger women? I mean, that’s very common.

The jerk cheated, got someone pregnant, and blew up his family. Now they’ll split up, their inheritance will be divided 4 ways, and he’s on the hook for a ton of child support, etc. for the next 18 years plus college, etc. Stupid guy. [/quote]

Or he moves on, gets a new wife, starts another family, and leaves everything to them. The earlier family doesn’t get an equal portion of the estate.[/quote]
[b]Most sane men are not interested in starting another family at 55. [/b][/quote]

Kevin Costner did. He's sane but has too much f.u. money. That turned out real well. :lol:[/quote]

Add John Paulson, 68 with a pregnant girlfriend, Murdoch who had a child at 72, Jagger and so many others. [/quote]

Murdock is not sane. Dave shouldn't have any more kids until he fixes the relationship with his current daughters. Having more kids when the relationship is fractured is a death sentence for it[/quote]

One has  nothing to do with the other but this isn't an easy fix.  He wasn't around much of their childhood as he was touring, etc.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics