Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Ward 4 Election"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's over - Lisa getting absolutely smoked in the $$ https://x.com/alisonhorndc/status/1758200212802187766?s=46&t=EwM4bfthPj_yHwyhXgwkdw[/quote] She has like another $60k in public funding coming soon (and she would already have it if she didn't screw up her initial campaign filing)[/quote] She also has screwed up in a giant ANC email thread - claiming she was hacked when she replied all instead of forwarding an email as attended. Gore is really off to the races to show she is not competent enough to be on Council, which says a lot. [/quote] Are you actually familiar with the Council? "No crime crisis!" Phil? "J$ws control the weather!" Trayon? Reply all to an email is hardly disqualifying. Crime is a very serious issue, one you clearly dismiss in bringing up such an utterly trifling point to try to deflect. Wow. [/quote] A very serious issue that[b] benefits from a deep understanding[/b] of the issues. That's what I've seen from Janeese Lewis George. I appreciate that she doesn't just blow with the winds of what's popular. We had Brandon Todd before and he'd do exactly that. It's useless, and I don't want to go back to that. I'd rather be able to have a meaningful discussion with Janeese even if we're not eye to eye on every issue. I'm sure the mayor would love to go back to having another lackey on the council.[/quote] DP but let's assume for the sake of discussion that JLG does have a deep understanding of the issues. What "benefits" on crime have you seen from that understanding? How exactly is crime getting better? Where are the benefits? Be specific, and don't just use platitudes from a website. What has she done to improve anything w/r/t crime? Because all I see from her is blowing with the winds of what's popular - blew in on an AOC current and now, just in the last two months, finally starting to smell that the wind is coming from a different direction and tries to pay lip service to the idea that her consituents don't actually want to dodge bullets daily. She's not good at paying lip service which is probably to her credit - she believes the stuff she said the first time and it hurts her spirit to pretend to get along with cops or want criminals arrested - but she's trying to say what people want to hear anyway.[/quote] As a councilmember, her job is policy and budget. The mayor and MPD are responsible for executing. So your question can't actually be answered unless she put on a cape and started Bat-manning criminals at night. Your last paragraph is just demonstrably false - she's always worked with MPD. Who are you and why are you bantering around talking points? As a ward 4 resident I find that extremely off-putting and only more of a reason to support Janeese.[/quote] Who am I? A Ward 4 resident asking you to back up your talking points. You are on here caping for her as the best option who has a deep understanding of the issues and then . . . cannot back it up with even one word. You also don't appear to know what a paragraph is, which is not a testament to whatever elementary school you attended. Support who you want but people can see lack of substance and hopping on here every month to crow about campaign contributions is not changing hearts and minds like you think.[/quote] [b]I don't think you're worth a detailed explanation. [/b] So sorry about mixing up paragraph vs. part of your post. I can see that's extremely upsetting to you. Have a great day.[/quote] DP, but, that's the best you've got? Yikes. These people all have records, why can no one seem to make a positive case based on those specifics? Not for JLG, Nadeau or Allen? Try harder. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics