Reply to Women’s World Cup

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Women’s World Cup "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] 3-4 quality chances does not equal “domination” - you are taking the comment out of context. Sweden had 1 good chance, 85th min that Naeher blocked. Nobody is arguing that Sweden was better…both teams play s- soccer and hopefully both will be home soon while quality teams compete for the Cup.[/quote]

In my math book, 4 vs 0 = domination. Seems like plenty of people on here agree. And if you knew soccer, you would recognize that 4 quality chances at this level is very respectable.[/quote]

I'm shocked US was favored so highly after their previous 2 games in this tournament.  SHOCKED.  They really are not all that.  They absolutely did not dominate Sweden.  The score was 0-0.  If you call that getting some chances to score, you could say that South Africa dominated Netherlands cause let me tell you, in that game, S Africa had about the same number of chances.  BUT they did not score.  The US did NOT score.  A 0-0 game means that nobody dominated.  That the odds were so high for the US to win is based solely on reputation not on reality.  If Sweden did not beat them, Japan would.  If not, Netherlands probably would if they played again.  I agree with PP saying both were S- teams.  A solid team is going to have players that can put the ball in the net.  It doesn't matter how many chances you have.  You have to score!  Even more if you had 4 chances!!!!  The more you have that you don't, the s- you are![/quote]

Well said. 3-4 quality chances will typically equal 1 goal…So maybe that game should have been 1-0 US, but this joker thinks that is domination. Lol. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics