Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "No surprise - Clarence Thomas is completely corrupt"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In my dream world, Biden gets the chance to replace Thomas (who is 74 and overweight and a black male) and we get a 5th female justice, and a majority female Court. I’d love the black female candidate who was also being vetted for KJB’s seat and who have would become the only non-Ivy educated justice. There is a real lack of understanding of the real world effects of their rulings. Perspectives from outside the Ivy League are needed. [/quote] That would be beautiful. But unless Thomas dies, he’s not going anywhere. The GOP has no scruples. [/quote] More finance “missteps” today…[/quote] What would you like the potted plant Roberts to do? Act or something? Tell Thomas that he’s been misreporting and promising to do better off and on for decades? Require some sort of [i]decent[/i] behavior from Thomas? No, no, no - potted plant John Roberts has achieved his goal and he’s not going to notice that he’s presiding over a joke. For those too lazy to click through, yes, Thomas is even more ethics challenged! This has got to be the stupidest man on the planet if he doesn’t know how to fill out these forms. “Over the last two decades, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has reported on required financial disclosure forms that his family received rental income totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars from a firm called Ginger, Ltd., Partnership. But that company — a Nebraska real estate firm launched in the 1980s by his wife and her relatives — has not existed since 2006. … The previously unreported misstatement might be dismissed as a paperwork error. But it is among a series of errors and omissions that Thomas has made on required annual financial disclosure forms over the past several decades, a review of those records shows. Together, they have raised questions about how seriously Thomas views his responsibility to accurately report details about his finances to the public.“[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics