Reply to Arlington Missing Middle Housing Q&A

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Arlington Missing Middle Housing Q&A"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Haven’t read all the pages on this, but just scanned a Boston fed report on increased density - even they say increased density makes neighborhoods less valuable/perceived quality declines for homeowners.

https://www.bostonfed.org/news-and-events/news/2022/10/boston-fed-research-relaxing-density-restrictions-best-way-to-increase-multifamily-housing.aspx

“House prices would likely fall with rents if greater housing density is allowed
The authors find that zoning reform that relaxes density restrictions doesn’t just reduce rents. It also causes house prices to fall—including single-family house prices. Their analysis shows that allowing one more housing unit per acre in a Greater Boston neighborhood increases the number of units in that neighborhood by an average of 0.4. This increase results in the neighborhood’s rents dropping more than 5% and house prices falling more than 7% on average (see graphic). [b]House prices drop because the housing supply increases. Or they fall because when a neighborhood becomes denser, its perceived quality declines[/b].“

Obviously, Boston is bigger than Arlington so our supply may not make a difference to prices but the perceived quality sure will decline!

[/quote]

that's great news! that way more people of all backgrounds can afford to live in Arlington. what's the problem with that? 
[/quote]

In theory it sounds good. But I don't think prices will decrease in any meaningful way. Affordable housing in desirable areas doesn't just doesn't seem to pan out.  If you can't afford to live in an area, go live somewhere else. I would love to live in San Diego, but here I am in DC  :roll: [/quote]

+1 to this. 
Developers say this will bring affordable housing to make it more palatable, and the BOS will probably fall for it but there's no way the housing created from this will be affordable. [/quote]

I don't know which developers are saying this, but the builders I work with think MMH will help them in several ways.  First, they can build multiple units on one lot and the combined price of the units will be higher than the price of one house, even given the higher construction costs.    [b]Second, ArlCo will have to relax standards on set backs, lot coverage, and storm water management to get developers to build MMH. [/b] Builders  can then argue that ArlCo has to do the same for single houses.  [/quote]

The board isn't going to do that. Builders can apply for variances, but the board sold this by saying the only change would be allowing a building that is already allowed to be built by right to house more than one family. Granted, people apply for variances for their SFHs already, but the scenario in which MM results in bigger buildings than the typical SFH new build is panic, not foresight. [/quote]

I got a variance for my house (screened in porch) and it was super easy. I am sure the MM developers will all get variances too - that is why I just roll my eyes when people say "things won't change because the lot coverage and set back rules aren't changing"[/quote]

That is also why builders often don’t put patios or screened in porches on new homes until the buyers close on the new house.  There is too much lot coverage for a screened in porch, but when the buyer owns it, the County is more lenient with variances.

You betcha ArlCo will give MMH developers any variances they want to induce builders to build in up-zoned neighborhoods.  If no one builds MMH the  ACB will  have egg all over their face. Katie Cristol, whose stared goal was to bring MMH to the east coast, is conveniently not running again in case it is a flop.    Libby Garvey said on Thursday night that some type of MMH would be passed soon, but it would take a while to get to the full program.   She also is not running.   Christian Dorsey is not running either and was at the meeting making worthless promises.

The three who are responsible for a divisive mess are walking away.

Your eye rolls are more than justified. 
[/quote]

Cristol just shows up at a rally supporting MM: https://www.fcnp.com/2023/02/28/coalition-rallies-for-arlington-missing-middle-housing/

This CB has no shame.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics