Reply to Prince Harry’s book

Forum Index » The DCUM Book Club

Reply to "Prince Harry’s book"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't quite get the argument that everything that has been in the press that isn't positive was made up by the press.

Sure trash tabloids make things up. But in the says after the Spanish book release, there were countless journalists who actually had their hands on copies of the book  and reported similar stories.  It would have had to be a massive coordinated effort for all journalists during that time period to agree and come up with all the fake stories and fake quotes. Jounralists like a scoop, why would they agree to wait until other agencies created a fake story when they had a copy of the book?

For example, the conversation between Kate and Meghan about the dresses. If that was just made up by the press and wasn't in the book, there would have been some journos refuse to pretend to read a fake story from the book just to stick to the party line. There just isn't that kind of mass collaboration and camaraderie across all press sources for it all to have been an orchestrated fake campaign. [/quote]

If you’d read the book or paid any attention you’d know that the bigger issue isn’t about things in the press being false it’s about the Royal sources feeding negative stories to the press and then pretending they are above reproach. Yes, sometimes they get it wrong. But more often it’s the spin that’s out on out the lack of context.[/quote]

That is Harry's belief and issue. And there is no way prove or disprove. I do not believe Charles would leak bad things about his kids. That is ridiculous and paranoia fed by Meghan, who WAS doing her fair share (and more) of story planting since 2016.[/quote]

DP.  You don’t seem to understand what a memoir is.  A memoir isn’t just a dry recitation of events with citations to outside evidence.  A memoir is meant to be about the person’s experience of those events, their emotions, etc. [/quote]

I know what a memoir is. That is my point. He is wrong about a lot of it because of his victim mentality and paranoia fed by his wife.[/quote]

And yet you can provide zero evidence to support that because you have not read the book.  Vague rhetoric is not a substantive argument. [/quote]

I have read plenty outside of the book and also observed with my own eyes.[/quote]

This is a book discussion.  Since you have not read the book and are not interested in reading the book, you have no place in this discussion. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics