Reply to Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just you wait till the next elections.

Savor ‘victory’ till then.  The progressives will be the Democrats’ Achilles Heel.  TJ is but a skirmish in the bigger battle to ensure schools are focused on education not virtue signaling.  [/quote]

Youngkin should just go ahead and set up the "Regional Governing Board" consisting of reps from all the participating jurisdictions (which is how TJ should be governed) which he is able to do under the current statute and put the control in that body instead of the FCPS.[/quote]

And FCPS should take back its school and make it local. I'm fine if there's no TJ. [/quote]

Some would be bummed. It is aspirational but the majority would be better off without it since it takes up a lot of time and resources that would be better spend on everyone instead of a few wealthy kids who will do fine anywhere since their parents will see to it.[/quote]

I don’t support continuing with TJHSST under the approach adopted by the School Board in 2020. It relies on the fiction that FCPS - already a massive, inefficient system - can replicate the equivalent of a sophisticated SLAC’s admission department and still address the needs of the 200 other schools in FCPS. That will never happen, so better to face the music now and wind TJHSST down than do further damage to the school and to the system as a whole. [/quote]

Strange take.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics