Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Reply to "[APS] Who is funding newly-incorporated APE "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] APS could do a lot things. APS already slowed down math acceleration a few years ago — before VMPI. Stay engaged. Give feedback. That has nothing to do with pushing misinformation during an election. [/quote] Conspiracy theories are tiresome. APE started discussing VMPI shortly after the school year started and parents started focusing on school-related issues again, which is a natural time to start that discussion. By your logic, no group, APE or otherwise, should be discussing any school-related issues right now in case they might affect how someone decides to vote in the election. That includes things like ventilation in classrooms and testing policies.[/quote] Look at the dates on those articles. The rest of us discussed this back in early 2021. Where was APE then? Oh right - yelling at school board members and parents. There certainly are still questions for VMPI & APS re: math, but advanced/accelerated paths isn't one of them. How about asking questions that don't feed into RWNJ talking points that were debunked months ago? [/quote] VMPI is still an ongoing process. Are you saying no one else is allowed to discuss it because you have declared it no longer of interest?[/quote] I actually said the opposite. We can file that under things you might notice if you were paying attention. [/quote] You said that advanced/accelerate paths shouldn’t be discussed now because you feel those issues are resolved. Other people still have concerns, which you seem determined to shout down. But every time you do, you just being more attention to it and get us talking about it more. Good job.[/quote] As I've said multiple times, people can and should discuss VMPI. Feel free to go join the other threads on it. There is a lot of info there. Maybe you (and APE) will learn something. And you - and APE - certainly can continue to push debunked RWNJ talking points if you want. No one is stopping you. But I'll continue to call it out for what it is. [/quote] And I’m sure you will keep obsessively bumping these threads to say it over and over again.[/quote] I'm the OP and I have been adding to this thread whenever APE does something relevant, as a newly-minted political lobbying organization. Guess we will see what they come out with next. The "scoreboard" should be interesting. I feel like we already know the outcome...don't you? Let's see if they surprise us. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics