Reply to MN Police Shoot and Kill Daunte Wright

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "MN Police Shoot and Kill Daunte Wright"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Full disclosure: I’ve only read one article and watched the video.

Questions:

-Did she and the other officers know they were arresting someone with an outstanding bench warrant?

-Did she know what the warrant was for?

-Doesn’t the fact that he was not only resisting arrest but actively fleeing warrant use of force such as a taser?

-Assuming that drawing the gun instead of the taser was a terrible mistake rather than her intended choice of weapon, why is this incident being labeled as fueled by racism? What would a black officer have done in that situation where someone resists and attempts to flee an arrest for an outstanding warrant (not a warrant for unpaid tickets, but for something serious as was the case here)? Taser him, correct?[/quote]

Automatic license plate readers are extremely common on Police cruisers across the USA.

They scan EVERY license plate the cruiser passes (yes - your car too.  Every time).

Registrations linked to outstanding criminal warrants appear automatically on the laptop present in every cruiser (yes, they have those too.  Have for years). [/quote]

Aren’t you smart? Clearly there either wasn’t a plate reader in the squad car in this situation, or the car was his mother’s. They didn’t learn he had an outstanding warrant until they took his ID back to the squad car and ran it there.[/quote]

Regardless, the 3 police officers in the video were placing him under arrest due to an outstanding warrant for a rather serious reason. And, he resisted and was actively fleeing.

This doesn’t seem racially motivated at all. [/quote]

Rather serious? He failed to appear in court on a permit ... <$500 fine and the court never notified him so his warrant wasn’t his fault.[/quote]

The warrant causes a lot of confusion because there was a fulfilled warrant for a case that was working through the court system, that he had to be aware of, and an open warrant for failing to appear about another alleged incident June 30th. The notice of hearing for that was posted March 4th and there are no returned mail documentations under that case number.

The fulfilled warrant was for an alleged felony offense and he was given a conditional release after posting bond. He would also be obligated to provide a current address to the court for the ongoing case, but there’s a documentation that mail was returned under that case number.

A hearing for the alleged June incident was scheduled for 4/02, which he did not attend. It isn’t clear why he didn’t attend or what channels he would have been notified through.

Since he didn’t appear, the judge issued a warrant for a gross misdemeanor and that’s what the officers on Sunday were attempting to take him into custody for. I agree there are cases where people don’t know they have warrants or don’t understand what that means. However, if officers have a signed warrant you can (and probably will, under these circumstances) be detained and arrested regardless.

These are allegations and sometimes people are falsely accused.

Not relevant to him being  fatally shot instead of tasered, since there’s never going to be any good reason for that to have happened. It’s pointless to even try to justify that.

But it is relevant to a limited extent of whether the officers were justified to attempt to detain him, and why the incident escalated so quickly when he attempted to re-enter the vehicle.

[/quote]

That's a lot of word to repeat what I said.

He had a court date.
The letter was never sent.
They erroneously put a warrant out for his arrest on a minor misdemeanor charge that was < $500 fine. That was the only thing the cops were arresting for.

It was a misdemeanor. ... it's against policy to chase a fleeing misdemeanor, they broke protocol to chase, they broke protocol to taser, they broke protocol to have the taser on the dominant side of the body....

because of their neglect a very young man is dead.
[/quote]

Wrong wrong wrong. The warrant was valid and it’s not up to officers to decide whether it was properly issued anyway. That is for a judge. If there is a warrant, they need to arrest. It is not against protocol to chase a fleeing misdemeanor - I think you are confusing it with high speed car chases, which are to be avoided because of the danger to the public. And it is obvious that the use of a taser was appropriate.[/quote]

It is not up to the officers to know the warrant was erroneous. But it is on the state, which is why they are liable for their actions that caused this death.

If there is a felony warrant they need to arrest. If there is a misdemeanor warrant, they do not need to arrest.

Yes, it is against police procedure to chase a fleeing misdemeanor... you can only chase a fleeing felon because copse kill so many people in chases they made them illegal.

A taser was over use of power.
Putting the taser on the wrong side of your body is neglect.

It sucks, I feel for the officer. She made a mistake and it killed somebody, kind of like having 1 too many drinks at Xmas and killing somebody.[/quote]

I’m sorry, you are just factually incorrect and clearly know nothing about policing. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics