Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Family Beach House- DS and Friends Using it for Summer."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Charging one kid rent and not the others is so unbelievably trashy and cheap. The cousins don't own the house either. I'm sure the Duke of Devonshire lets his grandsons stay in the manor house for free and then charges their school friends rent to sleep in the stable, because they're peasants who should be grateful to have any benefit of his attention or to even associate with such people. Not. How utterly gauche. [/quote] Uhh, the kids most certainly have an ownership interest. If the cops show up they are 100% the legal owner. So sad youre too dumb to know this. Back to your trailer...[/quote] Not unless their name is on the deed. [/quote] Seriously? This why cops run rough shod over citizens all day long. The kids are de facto tenants which grants them the same sights as property owners. LE needs their permission to enter the property unless there is a felony being committed in their witness. Same goes with rental cars and VRBO. You are equivalent to the owner of the property if the property owner has agreed to you being there.[/quote] Ha ha. I love DCUM-trained lawyers. No. You are completely misstating the law. [/quote] That's me you're quoting. I never claimed to be an attorney, but I have worked in commercial real estate for 26 years. If you are an attorney you are a piss poor one because the purpose of a lease to provide the sole and exclusive use of a property and be afforded the exact same rights as an owner, provided the terms are adhered to. From a LE perspective, it's irrelevant if the individual is a tenant or an owner. Did your online lawyer certificate program skip contract law?[/quote] Ha ha. You are too much. You have no idea what you are talking about. Kid who was invited there would be an invitee under the law. Grandkids would also. Stop it. It is irrelevant what you think you know. [/quote] Oh, you missed the part where the BILs are actual attorneys (not pretend ones like you) and would draw the lease? How embarrassing.[/quote] DP. Please. There are no major legal markets in areas where a beach house would be. So either they are not the legal superstars you think they are or they are too cheap/stupid to realize they need to hire an attorney that is familiar with landlord tenant law in the jurisdiction where the house is located. [/quote] Man, you are just dumb as a box of rocks. You know where huge amounts of Big Law Partners retire? The coast of the Carolinas. It's probably the number 1 spot on the East Coast.[/quote] I guarantee you that retired Big Law partners are not wasting their time learning about landlord tenant law in the Carolinas. No one in Big Law works on that type of crap and if they are retired it’s likely being 20+ years since they were in law school. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics