Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Concerned about buying in WJ cluster because of re-zoning"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Only using averages is a basic analysis, which only serves to identify which high school draws a higher percentage of rich kids. A better, refined analysis looks at the granular data, and isolates for race and socioeconomic status. When you isolate for race and socioeconomic status there is not much of a disparity between the performance of kids of the same backgrounds in these schools. For example, let's look at FARMS kids SAT performance (page 10): WJ = 1013 Einstein = 977 Wheaton = 948 White kids SAT performance (page 8): WJ = 1275 Einstein = 1148 Wheaton = 1173 There is no way to isolate for race + socioeconomic background, but I would wager that the white kids in Wheaton and Einstein generally are less financially well off, and come from families with fewer graduate degrees than their counterparts at WJ. I also think it's safe to assume the FARMS kids at Einstein and Wheaton are less financially well off relative to the FARMS kids at WJ. Bottom line: If you're worrying this much about your kids' education and are skewering PDFs of 2017 MoCo SAT scores your kids are going to do well whether they're at WJ, Woodward or Einstein. It doesn't really matter that much, aside from misconceptions of the uniformed general public that don't realize that a child's parents socioeconomic status and education level matter much more to a child's future than what school they go to, especially within the same school system. [/quote] This was one of the better posts in the thread.[/quote] Not really. It starts out with a "if you isolate for race and socioeconomic status" hypothesis, and ends with "there is no way to isolate for race + socioeconomic background," which means PP has offered nothing more than conjecture to support a hypothesis that he or she finds most appealing. It's neither logical nor likely to persuade anyone on the fence about buying in what might turn out to be the future Woodward district. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics