Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Magnet MS results - Takoma Park & Eastern - anyone heard today?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Obviously we they screened the ENTIRE student popultion they found some really smart kids with parents who aren't obsessive about their kids' educations. I love that they removed the parent component! It means access for all, not just the savvy. I'm eager to see what it means for CES! However, there is an obvious need to make sure the high achieving kids who didn't get into a special program are having their academic needs met, and, as I think we all know, that means clustering. This is good for kids and for teachers. [/quote] Agreed. People need to recognize that their white, UMC snowflake child isn't going to get a leg up just because they want snowflake to feel special 24/7. Equitable access to these programs is a *good* thing. - a white UMC mom [/quote] White UMC mother here; DH and I are both educated professionals. DC got accepted to MS magnet this year and had they not had universal screening we wouldn't have even applied, because while we consider our child to be very smart, it wouldn't have crossed our mind to presume that our child would necessarily be head and shoulders above the rest. (We're from the Midwest, so maybe it's Midwestern humbleness and "Please-you-go-ahead-of-us-ness"at play here :) ). When DC got accepted and I saw the scores, I was surprised. So if our family--white and UMC and education-oriented--wouldn't have even bothered applying, undoubtedly there are many, many other families out there who have highly able children but benefit from universal screening and removing the need for parental savvy and parental aspirations. Ockham's razor: the simplest explanation is usually the best explanation. They screened lots more people this year so not a surprise that the traditional results were different. This is exactly what universal testing was designed to accomplish--finding the best candidates who otherwise wouldn't have tried/known. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics