Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/ecmclaughlin/status/1580401721888514048?s=46&t=PO2HDlOi-K4iD5H9ZSbrcg[/twitter][/quote] So, what does this mean? You know, in real life? Any charges coming?[/quote] My gut is that DOJ is going to indict Trump, in DC and not Florida, after the midterms. [/quote] My bet is one thing they are working on is how to get venue in DC, or at least not SDFL. Putting this case in front of Cannon would be a disaster. They also still have a bunch of their evidence locked up in front of the SM. It’s all the unclassified stuff, so while not the most important, there’s still likely relevant stuff there they want to review first.[/quote] The crimes all began on Federal property in the Federal city so why wouldn't DC be the venue?[/quote] That's not true. The obstruction charge would be based entirely on conduct in Florida. The feds will likely try to link that to DC because the agencies/GJ being obstructed are in DC. I don't know if that will be good enough. The espionage charge might have started in DC, but it depends on whether he moved those boxes from DC before or after he was president. If they were originally moved while he was still president, it will be very hard for DOJ to say that was part of the crime- the president is certainly authorized to move boxes of government documents around. The crime they will charge will be unauthorized retention, not unauthorized removal.[/quote] A president cannot move boxes around for an unlawful purpose, such as concealing evidence of a crime or converting government property to his personal use (aka theft). Much of this links back to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation of the substantiated links between the campaign snd Russia, which itself implicated a conspiracy implicating Trump’s actions as a private citizen/candidate. Trump had the constitutional duty to take care that laws were faithfully executed and issues of possible venue will have to await development of facts relating to the scope of the conspiracy(ies). Kash Patel is linking the shenanigans with “declassification” back to 12/2020. It certainly was foremost in Trump’s mind on the morning of 1/20/2021. [/quote] It's nice that you think that, but 1) that's not what the Espionage Act criminalizes, and 2) there is no chance in hell that DOJ (i.e. the executive branch) is going to make arguments constraining the president's authority over government records. [/quote] When the boxes were moved around Trump wasn’t the President anymore.[/quote] As far as I’ve seen, there is no public info on when the docs were moved from DC to FL. That is relevant to the venue question. The docs may have been moved around within MAL after he left office, but that won’t get DOJ venue in DC.[/quote] There should be some sort of general information out there about when his stuff was shipped, and where it was shipped to. Individual boxes are going to be difficult to pin down, unless everything was shipped either before the inauguration, or after.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics