Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Also from the Washington Post article don’t  forget Zeke Brinsfield

“It’s Satan wanting to separate a child from the womb,” Brinsfield told the camera. In an interview later, he voiced a view out of step with many antiabortion activists, saying he opposes abortion even to preserve the life of the woman, because God “gives and takes away in all circumstances.”

Is it out of step? Because the state of Idaho is arguing in the supreme court that they shouldn’t have to save the mother. [/quote]

Fun y how the same principle is never applied to ED or any condition that only affects men. [/quote]
That’s the tell. It’s only “god’s will” when it’s a woman’s body, otherwise anything goes.

If the forced birther GOP gets back in power and gets to pass Project 2025, look for carve outs where men would be able to demand their sex partner get an abortion. Because forced birthers don’t care about life, as they’ve demonstrated aptly, they want to control women and the most basic right is bodily autonomy. [/quote]

There won’t be carve outs.  But Republican legislators and donors will always be able to get abortions when needed. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics