Reply to “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]To the PP who just can’t keep it straight.

[b]Roe balanced the rights of women against the interests in protecting the unborn[/b].  Dobbs stripped women of their rights so the court would not have to engage in any balancing.

Codifying Roe, doesn’t give women their rights back. It just puts their lives up for a vote. Unacceptable. [/quote]

That's what I have been saying. Roe, as a law, would make much sense and be in the books forever.

But it wasn't a law. It was some Justices lesgislating from the bench, which is no proper mechanism in our system, and the reason it eventually was repelled.
[/quote]

You lack fundamental understanding of constitutional rights. I’ve explained as much as I can. Law passed by a legislature cannot infringe upon your rights as guaranteed—GUARANTEED—by the Constitution. Red states will seek to invalidate any federal laws enshrining abortion access. They will win because [b]the Courts that will hear those cases are captured. [/b] And then they’ll win at SCOTUS.  And most women alive will still have fewer rights than they were born with.[/quote]

No, the real problem here is that you believe one too many conspiracy theories and believe you live in something like North Korea.

Nope, we live in the USA, the Constitution is alive and well ... and Congress should do its job. Again, LIKE EVERY OTHER COUNTRY.

[/quote]

You mean other democracies where legislatures cannot ban abortion because Women’s rights are protected?  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics