Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][twitter][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The one thing that certain PPs keep asserting without ANY evidence from police is that CB was drugged. That's a HUGE leap from what is publicly known. All the other hypotheses about who was where and who did what are based on the pieces of evidence that we know. But, the whole premise that she was drugged is entirely unsupported despite recent international events. The strongest theories of the case account for CB's whereabouts and actions without adding drugs into the theory.[/quote] It best accounts for no signs of struggle or defensive actions or wounds to BB as she fought for her life. What else explains? Very simple to do. Then only 1 victim to overpower. What are your theories as to where she was? Why do you think there were no signs of struggle? Why do you think there were no scratches to BB as CB fought for her life? [/quote] I’m finding it fascinating what theories people are willing to entertain and which ones they say are victim blaming/shaming and wildly inappropriate. [/quote] What are your theories as to where she was? Why do you think there were no signs of struggle? Why do you think there were no scratches to BB as CB fought for her life?[/quote] I don’t have theories, but I’ve asked the same questions you have and was told that I was derailing the conversation 🙄[/quote] The ones who want to baselessly speculate about CB in ways that are similar to BB's agenda don't like the brutal killings to be discussed, only victim smearing speculation. Just ignore and as Jeff says, don't feed the trolls. The victim smearing did not work re: LE or Commonwealth, nothing else matters. A jury will be horrified by the facts of the KILLINGS. And that a little girl was left with no mommy. [/quote] It isn't baseless speculation. There are many reasons why there is valid speculation into what CB knew of JR prior to the morning of the murder: -The account was created on her computer -JR talked to someone he thought was CB -A friend of JR said he was planning to meet a couple he had previously met. JR was sent a picture of CB so he knew what she looked like -There was likely a time when CB and JR were in the house prior to BB arriving. This would have been easier to manage if CR was expecting JR -There have been NO reports of CB being drugged We are all here speculating, including you. You don't get to draw the line on what is OK and your speculation isn't more acceptable than anyone else's because you end it with faux concern for the victim's families.[/quote] It really doesn't matter whether Christine was into kinky fetish sex or not. What matters is that her husband and his girlfriend killed her and Joe. The reason that Joe was in the house DOES. NOT. MATTER. [/quote] This thread is for speculation and discussion. It doesn't get to 280 pages without discussion on all aspects of the case. It's annoying how some feel they get to police what can and can't be speculated on.[/quote] +1!!![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
