Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I don't see how Blake inviting Taylor to one (short!) meeting with Baldoni or name dropping her in a few conversations means that Taylor is important to a case about whether or not Baldoni SHed Blake or retaliated against her later. There are likely hundreds of people who had that level of involvement with this production, including friends of Baldoni and Heath. Baldoni is friends with Rainn Wilson and we know for a fact texted Rainn (and others) about his conflict with Lively. Yet Rainn is not being subpoenaed or called to testify, because his involvement is very minimal. The same is true of Taylor. It just has nothing to do with the actual facts of the case. It's just exciting to people because it's Taylor Swift, the same reason people like the idea of that anonymous statement Lively filed the other day being by Scarlett Johansson. She's a big star so it's juicy gossip. But it really has no relevance to the case.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
