Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I still don't believe Taylor will be deposed, and if she is, I think it will be short and pretty inconsequential. She met Baldoni one time. She wasn't on set. I know people think she's going to give evidence like "Blake told me this was all a ruse to steal the movie" but... sorry, it just sounds farfetched. Taylor was touring Eras and in a new relationship at the time. I think she was being honest in her public statement that her involvement extended to letting them use her song for the trailer and credits and otherwise she knows nothing.[/quote]

That apparently didn't stop her from willingly handing over evidence to Baldoni's team. Clearly she has more involvement than what is known. [/quote]

Freedman testified under oath that he has evidence Lively threatened Taylor with blackmail. That'll be interesting to see the evidence at trial along with the alleged text messages from Blake urging Taylor to delete her all her former text messages that incriminated her. [/quote]

Not exactly. Freedman proved sworn testimony that a person came to him and claimed to have evidence that Lively threatened Taylor with blackmail. Freedman does not, himself, have personal knowledge of this happening. Which is why the judge immediately struck the testimony and bench slapped Freedman.

And the whole thing is hearsay. Also likely made up. But sure, go depose Taylor about it. Parties are limited to only 10 depositions in federal civil litigation, so it makes sense that Baldoni wants to use one of his on someone who was not present for any of the alleged SH or retaliation and who has publicly stated, multiple times, that she is uninvolved. Rather than, say, members of the movie's cast or crew who could presumably testify to his innocence.

It's all a distraction. And it worked, for now.[/quote]

You can’t have it both ways. Blake made sure Taylor was present for a meeting with Justin, when part of the script was discussed. She later used that meeting to urge justin to use the rewrite discussed, in part because Taylor loved it.

She used Taylor to get on young Lily’s good side by saying Taylor totally was integral in casting you in the film.

Now all of a sudden, she’s saying Taylor had no involvement? She shouldn’t have gone around on video on the red carpet blabbering about how much Taylor was involved and she shouldn’t have sent a text to Justin that threatened backlash from Taylor, her dragon, if he didn’t comply.

Blake F-ed around and found out.

[/quote]

Or named her in her disclosures.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics