Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump colludes with foreign dictator to keep innocent man in jail, solely to prove that Trump is above the law. "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=CommonSense][quote=Anonymous][quote=CommonSense][quote=Anonymous]Why is our military not going there to get this innocent man???????[/quote] He's not an innocent man. He was here illegally, found to be an MS-13 gang member twice. He had a hearing and an appeal. He was under court order to self-deport. He failed to do so. He is a citizen of El Salvador, not the U.S.. The gang he claimed to be threatened by if he returned to El Salvador no longer exists, nor does the overall situation in that country. His removal under US State Department Policy [b]IS[/b] a military action and is not subject to judicial review. Understand?[/quote] Not one thing you said is true. Not a single one. [/quote] Oh, but how wrong you are. Is it your contention he was here legally? Is it your contention he is a US citizen? Is it your contention he is not a citizen of El Salvador? Everything you said is untrue...every single thing.[/quote] He went before an immigration judge in 2019 and was told he cannot be deported to Salvador based on the danger to his life in that country. So if he was to be deported, that was the one country, he was not supposed to be deported to. So while he is not a US citizen and is yes, a citizen of El Salvador, he was in our country due to the danger to his life. And should not have been deported to that country. Why shouldn't he be allowed to get due process which is part of the constitution! Remember that document? that is the biggest issue here he should've been given due process. He was snatched off the streets w/out an arrest warrant and then just sent to the one country he was not supposed to be sent to.[/quote] DP. I agree with everything you said, but now what? Does the USA have the authority to force El Salvador to send him back? [/quote] Force El Salvador? lol. We’re paying them to keep him there. If we say release him, that’s all they need to hear. They said so themselves. What I’m wondering now is could another country like Canada agree to take him in if the US refuses to take him back? I can’t even believe I’m asking this question and I just am in disbelief what our country has become. It’s so sad.[/quote] We can not pay El Salvador to keep one of their citizens in jail. We have no authority to do so. He is in jail IN El Salvador because they want him in jail. As far as the USA refusing to take him back, that’s already settled. He has a deportation order, he will not be coming back, as he has no right to be here. He was always going to be deported, that has not changed. [/quote] This aged poorly.[/quote] You realize he’s not coming back to stay right? El Salvador is sending back their citizen to face charges, then he will be deported. [/quote] The main point was always that deporting him violated his due process rights and a judge's orders. Trump is not above the law nor is his administration. [/quote] So... he's back. To face Federal prosecution for some pretty horrible stuff. Not just one or two. But quite a few. I mean I am staggered at the degree of charges involving sexually abusing women and even minors and human trafficking and murder. And this is the man the Democrats wanted to turn into some kind of folk hero in defiance of Trump? Because you couldn't accept an El Salvadoran being deported back to his home country? This was never about "due process." You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it. I really hope Maryland voters turf out Van Holland. [/quote] It was always about the deprivation of rights. You can take your fake narrative and shove it. [/quote] Ok, so if he’s found guilty of murder and put to death, you’re ok with it right?[/quote] lol, can they prove that he murdered someone? Of course. We are ones that, know you, believe in law and order.[/quote] Federal grand jury in Tennessee Kilmar Abrego Garcia of very serious charges, mainly focused on human trafficking and abuse of women. This happened on May 21st. Federal grand jury indictments are rather significant and not done lightly. I concur this was never about "due process" for the Democrats but trying to owe Trump and it's backfired spectacularly. Kilmar Abrego Garcia already went through multiple appeals and each time his deportation order was upheld, the last one was upheld by the judge who also issued the clause that he couldn't be deported to El Salvador. The "mistake" was sending him to El Salvador, not deporting him. Of course I wonder what kind of game that judge was playing because you can't deport anyone to any random country so what were the other options? That aside, this entire Democratic mess has now opened up many more questions. How was he allowed to run freely in the US for nine years and leading human trafficking throughout the country while going through the court systems to fight deportation orders. Is that due process? Somehow I think not. He already had plenty of due process and was playing the game of shopping via appeals for a sympathetic judge, and he lucked on one. It was making a mockery of due process. Irony is that if Kilmar had quietly accepted his initial deportation order he probably wouldn't be facing decades in Federal prison before his final deportation back to El Salvador, where I don't doubt there are more charges he'll face in that country. Because he really is not a nice family man, you know. [/quote] You glossed right over Trump's 9-0 loss at the Supreme Court...[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics