Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump govt is deporting Green Card holder student exercising free speech"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What does it mean to "support Hamas?" Pledging allegience to Hamas would certainly count. Transferring money to "Hamas Inc." via wire transfer would count. Saying "I think Hamas' actions are justified" seems like a grey area. Saying I want a cease fire and think Israel is committing genocide doesn't necessarily equate to "supporting Hamas." Did Hamas even want a cease-fire? Certainly on their terms, but that applies to any belligerent. For all we know he might hate Hamas and prefer the PLO or some other organization. What evidence is there that the student "supported Hamas?" Merely asking for a ceasefire or asking Columbia to divest, would not seem to qualify as "supporting terrorism."[/quote] How 'bout this (which I posted earlier)? Khalil acted as a negotiator and sometimes spokesperson for CUAD (Columbia University Apartheid Divest). CUAD explicitly and officially issued a statement supporting Hamas and 10/7. As quoted in the Times: “We support liberation by any means necessary, including armed resistance,” the group, Columbia University Apartheid Divest, said in its statement revoking the apology. The group marked the anniversary of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by distributing a newspaper with a headline that used Hamas’s name for it: “One Year Since Al-Aqsa Flood, Revolution Until Victory,” it read, over a picture of Hamas fighters breaching the security fence to Israel. And the group posted an essay calling the attack a “moral, military and political victory” and quoting Ismail Haniyeh, the assassinated former political leader of Hamas. “The Palestinian resistance is moving their struggle to a new phase of escalation and it is our duty to meet them there,” the group wrote on Oct. 7 on Telegram. “It is our duty to fight for our freedom!” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/09/nyregion/c...ian-group-hamas.html[/quote] None of the quotes actually say that they support Hamas. Like the PP mentioned above, I guess it depends on what is viewed as support.[/quote] Well, the actual language of the statute says "endorse". Seems to me that the quotes clearly "endorse" Hamas. Your opinion?[/quote] Google is telling me that endorse is kind of a step up from support in that endorse means the support is more explicit and official. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics