Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "IVF embryos are people too"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Everyone is so focused on the frozen embryos. Anyone who has gone through IVF knows that fertilized eggs and eventual embryos are typically lost throughout the process. For those who aren't experienced, here's a primer: After roughly 2 weeks of injections, a women undergoes egg retrieval, in which a needle is inserted through the vaginal wall and into follicles within the ovaries to collect eggs (day 0). Immediately after the retrieval, those eggs that are mature are combined with sperm, often through a process known as ICSI (intercytoplasmic sperm injection), in the hopes that those mature eggs will be fertilized. In my experience, we received a call from our RE on day 2, once he had the report from the embryology lab, to let us know how many eggs were fertilized and beginning to undergo cell division. Once embryos reach the blastocyst stage (day 5 or 6), that is when they are typically frozen or occasionally returned to the woman's body via a fresh transfer. So there are 5 whole days there where some of those fertilized eggs are lost in the process, never reaching a mature enough stage for transfer or freezing. If the Alabama ruling holds, and they consider life to begin at the moment of fertilization, then that could potentially cause issues with the entire process, not just the frozen embryos. Would they hold someone accountable for the absolutely normal attrition of fertilized eggs in the embryology lab on days 1-4? What about if something happens to an embryo once it is thawed for transfer? Is someone criminally negligent there for authorizing the thaw/transfer process? This ruling is a can of worms, and there are most definitely some in the Republican party who 100% want IVF and even some other, less invasive, infertility treatments, to go away. That's where they plan on finding homes for all of the unwanted babies - the "barren" will "just adopt".[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics