Reply to SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business.  The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

[b]So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses.  That slippery slope is rea[/b]l.[/quote]

Didn't that already happen when the Little Red Hen diner turned away Sarah Huckabee for no better reason that she was a Trump appointee? 
I don't even think the employees invoked "religious principle" as a reason.  They just didn't like her politics. [/quote]
She was not turned away simply for being a Trump appointee.[b] She was turned away for defending the indefensible, namely a desire to ban gays in the military and the separation of children at the border from their traveling companions, which forced minors to advocate for themselves at their amnesty hearings even though they were too young to do so[/b]. (You might also remember that there was no protocol to keep track of the children, so they were essentially “lost” in the system and not all of them have been reunited with their families.) Huckabee Sanders was turned away for being the spokesperson for this cruelty.[/quote]

? Same thing. She was turned awya for her political views . End of.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics