Reply to Covid Relief Bill thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Covid Relief Bill thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump got them to review his Election fraud claims, Section 230, and bring up the $2K checks for a vote in the House. I mean okay whatever. I'll believe McConnell will allow a $2K vote in the Senate when it happens.

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqSYY1VXcAEo7Ih?format=jpg&name=medium[/img][/quote]

I like it.

The $2000 checks are a winning issue for Dems and a real problem for McConnell.  Vote on it and watch the Senate squirm just before the runoff. They do not need Trump, plus the Tea Party plus the runoffs. Popcorn time.

Something needs to be done about 230. But not the way Trump wants. Social media companies should not be able to monetize disinformation. Especially the personal libel/slander of private citizens that keeps ruining lives and putting lives at risk. If the earn clicks off it and Twitter is informed it’s libel, they need  to pull it down or pay damages. They are de facto publishers. And if they want to publish who killed Seth Rich conspiracies, they shouldn’t make a profit doing so. But that’s a substantive debate that needs to be decoupled from all things Trump. Unfortunately, Trump wants the opposite— more conspiracy theories.

I’m sure it will shock no one when Adam Schiff reports to the House next week that he’s talked to the FBI and DOJ and found no evidence of election fraud. But hey!   He looked.

Done. Done. Done.

The Defense Act veto override is going to be interesting.

So glad as a Fed that we are putting Trump’s control of the budget in the rearview mirror. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics