Reply to Playing time expectations

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Playing time expectations "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I didn't post anything about libel.  Sorry, wrong poster.  And if you want to keep this going, then stop complaining about the fact it keeps going.  I agree with the posters who say at 9, this playing time situation is ridiculous.  And the poster is justified in looking for another place for his kid to play. [/quote]

And you keep posting that position as if it is actually up for debate.

NOBODY SAID KIDS SHOULD SIT!!

You don't need to keep stating that point as if people are disagreeing with you. [/quote]

[b]Actually posters did.[/b]  They said this is travel, win at all costs, go back to rec soccer, take the kid to karate lessons.  They did.  And if you don't have a complaint with what I'm saying, then you have nothing further to post.  You agree with me.   Great, subject closed. [/quote]

No it doesn’t. “Best practices” simply means “industry standard”. 50% of playing time is a threshold that CLUBS agree is reasonable and achievable MINIMUM amount of playing time. A club may promise more but club to club a parent should not expect less. And this applies only if the club even has a playing time policy.

None of the above at implies what I believe.

I can say" it snows in Virginia in the winter". That is not a value statement. It does not imply what my opinion for or against winter actually is just that it snows. A statement of fact.[/quote]

They said it was "best practice" .  That is agreeing with it. [/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics