Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Costco shooter was a cop... and all 3 victims were unarmed"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]can we just take a pause to note that this is the 2nd fatal shooting at a Costco in california in 72 hours. no one is safe anywhere in this country.[/quote] Sadly true. What if there had been another cop in Costco that day who didn’t know the other guy was an off-duty cop? He looked like any other mass shooter, gunning down men and women. There would have been a blood bath. [/quote] What if...what it...blah blah blah What if it was an active shooter and an off duty police officer took out the shooter? You people are so brainwashed by the media. You sit around waiting for a video that appears to validate your hatred for police officers. And then you pretend to know what you're talking about despite having zero training or experience. Meanwhile, thousands of police officers deescalate potentially violent situations and choose not to shoot when faced with a potentially deadly threat. [/quote] What media dum-dum? I guess you got your information from smoke signals and not the media.[/quote] Guess what, some people are able to think critically and understand that perception of reality and actual reality are two different things. The media consistently promotes dramatic stories because they sell. People click on emotional stories, which means $$. Nobody wants to watch dozens of police videos of cops deescalating situations. It's probably hard for a coward like you to believe, but some people might actually know more about this subject than you. You know, like real life experience.[/quote] That’s their JOB, genius. That’s what we pay them to do. Other people have other skills and training and do other things. What if doctors had your attitude? “Oh, come on, I helped a few people this month, it must be fine to kill one or three of them today.” Really??[/quote] Whatever you say, straw man. I never said that the shooting is justified. I have no idea because I actually care about a thing called evidence, unlike you. But keep on think that you know what you are talking about.[/quote] Shootings. Plural. He didn’t just shoot and kill one person, he shot three people. One is already dead and one or even both of the others may still die from their injuries as well. It’s almost unbelievable to me (and a bunch of other people, judging from this thread) that you can possibly argue that the gunman was justified to shoot and critically/fatally wound three people. Repeatedly. Can you at least agree that EVEN IF the son had first “attacked” the man, a taser would have been equally effective at dissolving the threat and nobody would be dead? [/quote] First of all, tazers are not for lethal force situations. Nobody knows if this was a lethal force situations anyway. Secondly, it's not realistic that someone off duty would also carry around a bulky tazer Why do you keep saying that I think this is a justified shooting? Do you think it will come true if you keep saying it? :lol: [/quote] I don't think a Tazer is non lethal. If the subject of a Tazer is in perfect health, then a Tazer is safe. But that's not often the case.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics