Reply to Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities"

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is about using human beings to “retaliate” and as “political retribution”  to send a message to Democrats.  Using the lives of other as cannon fire to teach a lesson to dear leader’s political enemies.  Not to fix a situation, but to be purely spiteful with people.[/quote]

Aren't sanctuary cities where they are SUPPOSED to be?  Mont. Co. is one, according to the link upthread.  How is it retaliatory to send newcomers to areas DESIGNED to attract them?[/quote]

Exactly. Liberals are hypocrites. [/quote]

That wasn't WHY they were designated sanctuary cities, but go ahead and send them. [b]That will surely encourage another huge wave of refugees.[/b]

[/quote]

Ok - now we're trying to wordsmith.

Sanctuary cities are INDEED much more hospitable to newcomers.  That's a FACT!  The availability of resources necessary to provide a comfortable solution for these people is the reason why people come.  an added benefit?  the ability to track newcomers in case there's another Rockville HS rape incident . . .

EVENTUALLY, MOST will report to friendly areas, which translates into sanctuary cities.

So you  can dance around the definition all you want, but liberals created the rules and now you have to learn to live with them.

And I do question what I added in bold.  I may be stupid to make an ASSumption, but I'll do it anyway.  Is that "threat" one that comes from fear?  It appears as though you DON'T want to invite more of "them" in.  Am I correct? 
[/quote]

It's not a threat. Just a likely outcome.

Would [i]you[/i] consider it a threat? Intentions don't matter, so I'm told. So it's really just how [i]you'd[/i] interpret it, right?

[/quote]

lol

It's NOT a FUTURE outcome. It's already in place.  That's what you don't seem to get.  [/quote]

You don't think that even LARGER groups of refugees will come if they know that Trump is welcoming them into the country?

[/quote]

Spring and Fall caravans have been growing in size and frequency over the course of many, many years. These groups aren't coming because Trump wants to build a wall, they are coming because they know they are able to get services and a world class education from the moment they make it across the border. Widening 270, building new schools, building the purple line are all necessary to accommodate the explosion in economic and population growth unless someone picks up the can instead of kicking it until the next Election Day, then the next, and the next.

Trump picked up that can. Unyielding Democrats are tossing it back on the ground to kick it through the next election. Democrats, you want it, you got it. You own the can.

Once we reach the tipping point, we'll have no choice but to go to a VAT.[/quote]

They are coming for the jobs. That is why the GOP (business owners) doesn't REALLY want to cut down on undocumented workers. Who do you think is hiring these people?

And it's funny - up until recently we were at historically low border apprehensions.

[img]https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/sw-border-apprehensions-by-fiscal-year.jpg[/img]

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics