Reply to LAMB closing its existing campuses and consolidating to one campus

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "LAMB closing its existing campuses and consolidating to one campus"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Also anyone could see WR was just too small and it would ensure that lamb would have to lease at South Dakota. i don't believe the Kingsbury move will happen though. It will be a Walter Reed situation where we are told it's happening and the administration messes it up.

Let's stop personally attacking people brave enough to stand up and take a position on something. [/quote]

WR was never intended to be for the whole school and I have never heard the administration indicated it was supposed to be.   What was the WR "situation" that you are referring to?  [/quote]

It was intended to be the final home of lamb. But in the end lamb got such a small part, there was no way that the whole school would fit there. WR and Missouri aren't enough to contain the whole school. So that, combined with the lease of South Dakota is a reasonable assumption that it would stay in South Dakota.

And I agree wjth the other poster that we would have left when they would have tried to push us over th WR. [/quote]

All upper elementary will now be at Walter Reed. So that is only option at 4th. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics