Reply to “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset. 
[/quote]
I still maintain that the primary threat against the regressive justices will be right wingers who want to give the appearance of violent liberals as they did throughout summer 2020. This is the way the GOP operates and violence and intimidation is specifically the way the forced birther movement has worked throughout the last fifty years. [/quote]

O.  M.  G.  
This is exactly what I would expect a LWNJ to say.  You people are in fine form today, even as one of your own has admitted to attempting murder of three conservative judges.  [/quote]
And your foolish non-response is exactly what a forced birther would say. For fifty years you guys stalked, murdered, kidnapped, blew up, set fire to and vandalized, and with the blessing of the regressive justices who said it was permissible to harass clinic workers [i]at their homes[/i] and to harass women seeking medical care, that forced birthers’ freedom of speech took greater precedent than anything else.

No one takes you seriously anymore, are you getting that yet? No one buys your crap about “life” because we can see you don’t give a crap. [/quote]

Except that I'm pro-choice.  Which absolutely negates your unhinged rant.  Believe it or not, you can be pro-choice without being a far-left loon.[/quote]

We need more sane pro choice people, so continue to speak up.  These people have redefined "pro choice" so much that even though I believe abortion should be legal in most cases, the extreme lunatics attack me for being "pro life."  There must be a sane middle ground.  [/quote]

There was a sane middle ground. It was called Roe.[/quote]

Roe was indeed a sane middle ground, had it been passed by Congress.

What have Dems been doing for FIFTY years?[/quote]

Being obstructed by Republicans. [/quote]

You're joking, right? Dems have had clear majorities in Congress several times for FIFTY f#####g years, and you say with straight face it's Republicans' fault?

Someone has sold you a huge bridge.[/quote]

[b]Not filibuster proof.
[/b]
Also, there was the lie those Republicans told about Roe being "settled law. "[/quote]

False.

Plus, with Roe in place, Dems could have negotiated with some moderate Reps like McCain. Now there's no leverage.[/quote]

DP.  [b]With Roe in place, moderate Republicans had zero incentive to join abortion protecting legislation[/b] that would have alienated a significant portion of their base.[/quote]

On the contrary, they would have an incentive to pass a law similar to those in Europe, for example making abortion legal and straightforward until 15 weeks, and hard afterwards.

How do I know? Well, that's exactly what Republicans in Mississippi did, in the case that reached SCOTUS.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics