Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The one thing that certain PPs keep asserting without ANY evidence from police is that CB was drugged. That's a HUGE leap from what is publicly known. All the other hypotheses about who was where and who did what are based on the pieces of evidence that we know. But, the whole premise that she was drugged is entirely unsupported despite recent international events. The strongest theories of the case account for CB's whereabouts and actions without adding drugs into the theory.[/quote] It best accounts for no signs of struggle or defensive actions or wounds to BB as she fought for her life. What else explains? Very simple to do. Then only 1 victim to overpower. What are your theories as to where she was? Why do you think there were no signs of struggle? Why do you think there were no scratches to BB as CB fought for her life? [/quote] there are MANY possibilities not involving drugs -- I can only imagine some... Maybe CB was in the shower when BB and JM forced JR at gunpoint to go into the bedroom and shot him, then they surprised CB. Maybe they had guns on CB and JR from the start and it happened so fast that CB didn't struggle b/c she was begging them to stop. Who knows ! That is why we are all trying to come up with explanations of how BB switched out his gun for a knife and attacked CB. While drugging CB is a possibility that we can imagine, there isn't any evidence of that, and most likely, the police would have mentioned that a woman was drugged and killed if that had been part of the evidence. It's not 100% that they would have given that out, but it's more likely than not that it would have been mentioned, and it wasn't. So, the more likely scenario is that CB was over-powered somehow. There is no evidence of drugging. period.[/quote] People fight for their lives, instinctively. No mentioned scratches on BB, ripped nails, skin under nails, etc. Scratches to him would have been in early stories, well before forensics came back. When someone comes at you with a knife you try to hold them off. Unless there is a reason you can't. Unless you work for the Commonwealth, in which case you wouldn't be posting, you have NO IDEA as to evidence that has not been discussed in court. Tick tock, more forensics to come. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics