Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They were great players at union (boys) and Brave (girls) that got dropped, not because they were benching, but mostly how the process was established. All behind doors, not a fair process in my view.[/quote]

+1.  Applies to my player.  Didn't think process or outcome was fair.  [/quote]

Applies to our player as well.  We aren't sticking around to support MYS, the club we've been with (for the most part) since our college-age player was U6. We didn't expect any special treatment, as we know for a fact some received.  We only wanted a fair tryout process and possibly a little loyalty.  MYS has not lifted a finger to advocate for its member players over outside players who are not any better.[/quote]

I think part of the problem is that you still see this as a McLean led team. [/quote]

No, we understand it's not a Mclean led club - or definitively not on the boys side.  However, MYS is one of three teams with ownership in the club.  All three of the member clubs should be advocating for their players - when it comes down to choosing between a member player and an outside player who are on equal footing. [/quote]

No, McLean has no ownership in FCV. FCV is an independent club.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics