Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"We acknowledge the process presented challenges and recognize concerns raised by Ms. Lively deserved to be heard."

You don't make this concession on a frivolous lawsuit. There would be no reason to do so. This sentence strongly indicates that Wayfarer felt they had more to lose at trial than Lively did.[/quote]

This is an admission she didn't make things up to steal the movie (this argument was always so dumb). That reaffirms that Wayfarer's defamation and extortion claims were not in good faith, not that this wasn't apparent.[/quote]

It is nothing of the sort. Keep dreaming [/quote]

Of course it is. If "concerns raised by Ms. Lively deserved to be heard" that means they were actual concerns, that were not lies that she made up to steal the movie. (That doesn't mean she would have won at the trial, but that her concerns were in good faith and therefore not lies).[/quote]

It simply doesn’t mean that. But if these are stretches you are making the you are not worth arguing with [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics