Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Indiana's Religious Freedom law"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [blah blah blah about sex that is "unnatural in most monotheistic or abrahamic faiths"] That criteria is well established in these faiths. Respect for such beliefs is codified in US law and confirmed via the Boy Scouts of America decision of the SCOTUS. [/quote] Let's all be clear about what the Boy Scouts ruling from the Supreme Court really says. It's not really a decision about religion, but rather about the First Amendment. It essentially says the First Amendment's guarantee of "freedom of association" (the right to group together with like-minded people, and not join groups with people you disagree with) is important enough to trump state laws prohibiting groups from discriminating. The Boy Scouts claimed (somewhat weakly IMHO) that exclusion of homosexual members was a core tenet of the organization, so the Supreme Court supported the Boy Scouts' freedom of association rights to refuse to admit homosexual members. It's the same freedom of association that allows the Boy Scouts to exclude girls. I've never researched this, but I suppose this same logic would allow the KKK to exclude black people from membership, or maybe to permit the "He-Man Woman Haters Club" to exclude women (even though they let Darla join!). So when you point to the Boy Scouts ruling to claim the Supreme Court confirmed the right to discriminate against homosexual citizens, or to claim the Supreme Court upheld the importance of religious beliefs, you're misinformed. An interesting side note - In 2014, the Boy Scouts voted to change their policies and admit openly homosexual youth. It sounds like there is also a lot of support for permitting gay scout leaders, but that proposal did not get a majority vote yet. Nevertheless, I suspect the Supreme Court might rule differently if faced with another gay scout leader case today, because the Boy Scouts can no longer claim excluding gays is a core belief of the organization. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics