Reply to The subtle micro aggressions of islamophobia

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "The subtle micro aggressions of islamophobia"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Jeff would not do anything because I wanted him to. He would act on his own sense of right and wrong. The articles quoting experts will expose the extent of your islamophobia. What owner of a blog will want islamophobes to have free reign to use his blog to propagate hate? [/quote]
You have no idea what his sense of right and wrong is.  He hasn't stopped this till now, and he won't, for the reasons you outlined.[/quote]

But I do know your idea of right and wrong ISN'T shared by him. This was evidenced by the fact that 1) he said you (if you are the islamophobe in question) might have an agenda here and 2) the long, combative posts by you to him, which then also extended into the Web Feedback forum.

He has not stopped the threads and I appreciate that he hasn't because it is providing valuable information for the writers and investigative journalists.[/quote]
You say above that he will stop it.  Then you say you are happy that he hasn't. Which is it?

I don't think I wrote any posts to Jeff, and certainly not any long combative ones. When and if I write a post to Jeff, it will start with "Hello, Jeff."

Web feedback forum? Don't know what you mean. Never saw the place. But I know you like to make stuff up.[/quote]

There are about three islam haters, one of the most vocal ones wrote and started arguing with the owner of this blog, Jeff. Then she continued the combative posts to the Web Feedback forum.

These threads provide a wealth of information to those who want to publish articles on Islamophobia. They have also permitted me to use scholarly resources to refute the islamophobe's assertion and ultimately prove her a liar. So for now it is helpful the thread remain active. However, I think when the articles are published and links to them provided here, Jeff may shut it down. [/quote]

You are aware that it is YOU that started multiple posts on Islam and YOU who got offended when no on bowed down to your posts by automatically agreeing with you and YOU who keeps calling everyone names because of it right?

It's pretty obvious that this a simply your tactic to conjure up "islamaphobia" articles for false sympathy.  YOU are seeking to attack, YOU are seeking out people to call Islamaphobe and YOU are doing all this to make yourself relevant with your "contacts".

Standard Islamic tactics, attack and then when attacked back, feign discrimination and innocence while simultaneously name calling your provoked attackers to garner sympathy.  
(For reference-- see most situations around the world.)

To the rest on here, if you read the newspapers often, you will see how so many articles are slanted with "Muslim sympathy", the buzz word around the world now is "Islamaphobe" and no one wants to be accused of it so words are written very carefully and often in a bias favor to gain points as "fair".

I hope the harping on by this PP allows us to better see that.  I've read many articles where complete facts were withheld and not written because it would make some Muslims look bad, but the facts are the facts and PP has shown us how easily she (and her cohorts) will twist the words and highlight only the parts that are to their advantage.

If you point out any different, you will deemed an Islamaphobe and demonized.

[/quote]

Let's bump this up just to be clear of your agenda.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics