Reply to Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's a very valid proposal and I wish MCPS would have had the stones to propose it themselves. However it is tone deaf for one school community to propose a boundary change impacting a different school community and not consulting them. [/quote]

They sort of did with all of their 9 or so options over the year.  It just didn't get positive feedback during the surveys and Taylor did what he believed was best for MCPS. It's his fiduciary duty after all.

Agree the petitioners should have consulted the various communities impacted but went on their own bc they don't care about anything but property value.[/quote]

It's kinda sad because they think they did "reach out" to work with the other schools. They sent chaser messages to anyone with a connection and pretended to just want to chat and get perspective, when it was really just to say "we're working together." And when they didn't get the response they wanted or expected--that the two ESes in question would leap at the chance to attend WJ--they dropped that tactic and quit engaging in the discussion with them.[/quote]

That is true.  I am from one of the affected ESes. When they thought I would be there prop, they replied.  When I learned more and told them I disagreed with their position and motivation and actually like what the Superintended proposed, they ghosted me. And I was engaging in good faith.  They don't care about the actual people it affects. They care about the house value.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics