Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Elementary School-Aged Kids
Reply to "Why don’t schools have stronger policies about redshirting? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Nobody with a brain wants their kid to be the youngest so this is a game that always has losers.[/quote] Many people would prefer this. [/quote] Being on the older side: It makes them more socially mature when can help navigate school situations easier. All top students end up on accelerated tracks so they just end up at the very highest or beyond accelerated track. An extra year of AP classes in high school can save a year of college tuition. Depending on the sport, it can give them an extra year to train and grow before college recruitment. This idea that kids need to struggle is probably true, however you let them struggle on a highest accelerated track rather than the standard track.[/quote] What makes you assume younger kids will not academically achieve? So, you hold the, back, pay an extra year of preschool to pressure them to speed up to skip a year of college. Why skip a year of college? They aren’t more mature. They are less mature if they are older with younger kids. [/quote] Just as an example, my kid was already 2 years ahead academically and then we redshirted and now 3+ years ahead academically. It didn’t slow him down at all because he would always need acceleration. What the class covers would never be helpful.[/quote] What, do you have your kid tested? What is with mothers claiming their five year old are 2 years ahead academically? With regard to what exactly ? Then keep a kid back with kids a year younger so he could be the big smart kid ? “ It’s not what the class covers.” No kidding, it’s kindergarten. Unless he was socially awkward and that might be the case there would be no reason to repeat preschool. If he was in fact two years ahead, and I’m not sure what that means at this age, the preschool would say he needs to move on. [/quote] Most high quality preKs around here have redshirt classrooms.[/quote] Correct, kid was in a redshirt only classroom so it was not a repeat of K but had a differentiated curriculum.[/quote] I will add that being an adult sucks so we had the option to let our kid have another year at childhood and jumped at it. If that upsets you, look in the mirror and figure out what that says about yourself.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics