Reply to Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I know option 3 = bad, but which option is good?[/quote]

I'd say option 2 -- good utilization and reasonable looking distances/clusters. [/quote]

And split elementary articulations for at least 11 schools, mostly from the DCC.  No thanks.

This is why there should be at least 2 more options currently on the table, offering blends.  Going with 4, each of which is heavily weighted towards a single priority, doesn't allow us to see what more balanced configurations might bring.  That will tip public opinion toward a best-of-the-bad one such as 2, typically expressed in the survey without nuance (most won't take the time to provide such), which inappropriately will result in a conclusion that things like continuity or diversity don't matter and, then, to a rather suboptimal decision.[/quote]

I agree that they should be giving us different options -- and none that they aren't seriously considering. I don't think having 4 extreme options each that maximizes just one of the factors they are looking at is a good starting place. I don't know why anyone from MCPS thought that was a helpful idea.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics