Reply to BOYS 2026 DMV Commitments BOYS

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "BOYS 2026 DMV Commitments BOYS"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Gonzaga is in big trouble….all those years of no recruiting coupled with no money for lax kids.  Will be a .500 team or worse in 2025 and 2026.  They can only hope that their solid 2028 class develops quickly.  2026 and 2027 classes are weak.[/quote]

I think lots of people are saying the 2027 class is weaker across most schools.[/quote]

I don't disagree, but it's odd because the 2027 NL and ML club teams are relatively stacked compared to the 25, 26, 28 and 29 NL and ML clubs. Nationally the 2027 class is considered to be very strong, and both NL and ML 2027 club teams are highly competitive. Perhaps those NL and ML kids are spread too thin across the big privates, and the 2027 DCE team being pretty weak doesn't help across the region. [/quote]

2026 NL #13, 2026 DCE #14 - both Top 15 Teams
2027 NL #1
2027 DCE #50 not so good lost best player to NL
2027 ML #11

Would agree the players are spread out and would think most found homes at SJC and the others to Bullis in the 2027 class.  Think SJC got the better of them for sure!

[/quote]

2026 NL and DCE teams are highly ranked, but nationally the 26 class is considered weaker than the 27s. Make of that what you will.

SJC definitely got more of the 27 NL and ML players than anyone else. And some of those kids are studs. I don't know much about the SJC team this year, but if SJC considers their 27 class weak, then everyone who plays them is in trouble.  [/quote]

The problem is that SJC has too many players.  kids will never get to play.  I don't know what they and their parents are thinking.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics