Reply to Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m a woman and I don’t think he did it. [/quote]

I don't see how you can reasonable conclude this. On any level whatsoever. [/quote]

How? Cops have the ability to determine our innocence and guilt on a dime and plant evidence in or against our favor. The cops happened to like the burglars more than they liked Scott so Scott went to jail and they didn’t [/quote]

Or maybe the cops, like everyone reasonable realized that the lying con man ready to flee to Mexico clearly did it. It wasn’t some satanic cult, or random burglars, [b]it was the husband like it almost always is. Scott was just the type and all his behavior points toward his guilt.[/b][/quote]

[b]Behavior is not an arbiter of guilt[/b]. What does acting guilty even mean? He didn’t know he was supposed to grieve on the 24th when he met cops. He thought Laci was still alive. They all did. Laci’s family thought she was alive too. He asked the cops if they should search hospitals because the Peterson and Rocha families assumed she went into labor prematurely.[/quote]

Yes, it most certainly is.[/quote]

No it isn’t and a policeman’s job is not to presume anything but find the body and then  run the forensic tests. Dental records especially are a huge clue in most homicide cases.   The crime scene and the fact a noose was tied on baby connors neck was assumed to be from debris but how does a knot with a bow tie get tied in the water? That’s a handmade knot. There are details like that they ignored. We don’t know if Laci was lactating, if she was raped or SA’d, if the baby ate, if Laci was wearing clothes from her house, what happened to her watch. They did nothing with the actual evidence.

They just wanted Scott to go to jail because he gave them a cup of water with a coaster and didn’t cry.

[b]Scott told the cops exactly Where he went fishing that afternoon. Why would a murderer tell cops where he placed a body?[/b][/quote]
Uh because many many people saw him, and if he tried to lie it would make him look even worse? C'mon, you can't say that makes him innocent. [/quote]

Yeah, to me this is most incriminating part of the whole case by far, that the bodies washed up in the same area that he went fishing, which was 90 miles from home. What are the chances someone other than Scott just happened to dump them in the same area?

It's also a bizarre aspect of the case. He established this whole fishing alibi to show where he was and that he couldn't have killed Laci and yet that's where the bodies wash up. WTF?  Normally an alibi is setup to demonstrate innocence. It totally backfired in this instance. My guess is that he was confident that the bodies wouldn't be found and that's why he was happy to show evidence of his fishing trip. Not very smart.[/quote]

The bodies were planted there after the search stopped in March. How does electrical tape stay stuck on both Laci and Connors skin if they were submerged in water for months? The tape  would’ve been the first thing to  loosen and float away[/quote]

Badly decomposed bodies consistent with being submerged in water were planted? Sure. Sure they were.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics