Reply to Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]It's quite typical through the course of an interrogation for law enforcement to use deception to advance their investigation. In Scott's case, however, the lies and deception of the police and prosecution were not used while interrogating Scott; instead deception was used, as Detective Brocchini testified, "to plant seeds of suspicion".

-Police lied to family and friends saying Scott had purchased life insurance on Laci after she became pregnant.

-The police suggested to Scott's employer that he may be embezzling and an internal audit was done. No improprieties were found.

-The police repeatedly stated in their press conferences that they were unable to confirm that Laci was walking her dog in the park.  They were unwilling, not unable.

-The police released photos of Scott's truck and boat on January 2, 2003 and issued a statement that they were trying to corroborate trip to the Berkley Marina. This left the public with the perception that they couldn't confirm Scott's story. Scott had given them his receipt from the Berkley Marina on December 24th and the police had interviewed a city worker on December 27th who had seen Scott at the Marina on December 24th.

-The prosecution insinuated Laci's body was found in the pants she was wearing the evening of December 23rd (which would implicate Scott). Laci's sister, Amy, had told police that they were not the same pants

-Detective Brocchini removed information from a police report that was favorable toward Scott. He found a witness who saw Laci at the warehouse just days before she disappeared. This would corroborate Scott's statement that Laci knew about his boat. However the police were trying to make the boat look like a secret purchase, so Detective Brocchini excised the information from his report.

It's shocking to think that Scott is on death row and there is no physical evidence against him, the prosecution provided no motive, the prosecution couldn't even state how or when Scott killed Laci and on top of all that, Scott told no lies pertaining to the crime he's convicted of. Did Scott lie? Yes. Do any of those lies have anything to do with Laci and Conner's disappearance or murder? No. It's ironic to think that so many people believe that Scott is guilty largely due to his lies and infidelity, and yet what most people think to be true about Scott and this case is a lie.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics