Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "DHS Creating "Disinformation Governance Board""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Has there been a moment in history where foreign adversaries used our first amendment speech against our democracy so prolifically and aggressively? Everyone is entitled to their opinion. What about opinions propagated with the express purpose of destroying our way of life? Are they damaging enough? What about opinions spread for the express purpose of getting millions of Americans killed? Or for causing a catastrophic collapse of our healthcare system? Is all of that protected speech? I haven’t noticed this current administration use military force to stop citizens from exercising their first amendment rights… I did see that with the last administration. No one is currently stopping anyone from petitioning the government. I have no reason to believe a second Trump administration wouldn’t attack the people, just as he did his first time in office. [b]My first amendment right seem far safer with our current executive branch[/b]. [/quote] Perhaps that is because your opinion and views are in line with this administration. [/quote] No, it’s because the guy that ran the last administration is bragging that he will invoke the Insurrection Act to put US military in the streets to quell the inevitable protests if he wins again.[/quote] We have a binary choice ahead of us. One guy has already retaliated against protesters with the force of the military And promises to do it again. The other guys asked Twitter to pretty please not post Russian psyops against our citizens. Those are the choices [/quote] Nice spin. And, when was the force of the military used? Was that during the riots of 2020? IOW - justified use? Biden admin censored the speech of citizens..... not Russians [/quote] Spin? I’m embarrassed you are so uninformed. Trump used force to clear peaceful protesters. He used the military to do it. You should be outraged. The Rosenbergs were citizens too. Hansen was a citizen. [/quote] yes and Trump’s actions are exactly why we need strong 1A protections. still stumped as to why you don’t get this. is your view that 1A jurisprudence should expressly favor Democrat’s political speech? Because legally, there is not all that much difference between Stacy Abrams claiming her election was stolen and the “big lie” claims, at least as far as speech alone goes. [/quote] Gee last time I checked, Stacy Abrams didn't enlist the aid of violent gangs of thugs like the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers and didn't plot and organize an attack on the Georgia State Capitol and attempt to overthrow the election. Stop with your #whatabout and #bothsides nonsense. It's not even close.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics