Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "SVB failure "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The fee should follow up with a significant increase in the amount of insured deposits for commercial accounts. [/quote] ...which would require larger fees paid by the banks to FDIC. Do you really think they will agree to that?[/quote] Do they have a choice? I doubt the FDIC is going to go all King John on them. But maybe they will require banks to insure a higher amount for deposit accounts owned by unsophisticated investors (consumers and small businesses)[/quote] They should charge a higher fee for sophisticated investors. They're the ones that caused this and they're who we're placating. Credit flight risk is much more impactful and common with them.[/quote] No, they can let sophisticated investors decide for themselves if they want an insured account for a higher cost. And they shouldn’t make them whole if something happens.[/quote] That’s exactly what we did, but then at last minute we made them whole without them paying. Genie never going back in that bottle?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics