Reply to Why are book banners showing up at FCPS SB meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Why are book banners showing up at FCPS SB meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Np here.  It’s in the pp’s second paragraph.  And frankly, I would say I don’t share pp’s values, and I don’t think it’s a casual thing to be discussing with a third grader.  The lack of boundaries around sexuality and minors exhibited in this thread is just disturbing.  [/quote]

+1[/quote]

Look, you cannot engage in an honest conversation with anyone that see's the images in Gender Queer and asserts that they are not pornographic,  or that they are, but its appropriate pornography for school.  It has depictions of oral sex; plural.  Multiple depictions.

And the fact that it is homosexual oral sex is completely irrelevant.  It would be pornographic and inappropriate if it was heterosexual as well.

You can't defend this.  It's wrong.[/quote]

Correct.  Trying to engage certain folks on the left is a waste of time.  Often, the response is an ad hominem attack or an non sequitur.  But what you can depend on, unfortunately, is the left defining deviancy down. [/quote]

“Deviancy”??

Spoken like a true homophobe. Which is the core premise of this book banning effort.

[/quote]

Thanks for proving my point.  Ad hominem attack: check.  Defining deviancy down:  check...I'll explain this second one.  The earliest age of a high-school student is 13.  In a school library, should a 13-year old be faced with oral sex graphics, whether hetero or homo?  You seem to think that is okay, and that is defining deviancy down.   [/quote]

It’s not ad hominem - it’s exactly the underlying premise of these theatrics.

Sexual experimentation is normal and healthy, not “deviant”. 
[/quote]

Right.  A school providing content for sexual experimentation for 13-year olds.  Would there be a more accurate description of defining deviancy down?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics