Reply to Loudoun - the class act of DMV

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Loudoun - the class act of DMV"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No matter how many staffers or sucker parents hop on these boards the facts remain:

1) ethically and performance wise you are equal to my dogs feces
2) between  this winter and next spring you’re going to lose several players in your black and red levels [/quote]

literally, you are posting anonymously on an internet message board, calling a youth sports club dog shit and bragging that it will "lose several players," (a) as if that's not par for the course in youth soccer, and (b) as if it matters.

life is short, man. find a healthier way to deal with whatever is eating at you. i don't mean to be flippant here. consider talking to someone.

it's kids playing soccer. it's really not that important.[/quote]

Not PP. Also, not a crystal ball reader. rather an official that has worked for many years in the area. While I wouldn’t necessarily be excessively graphic with the observation I do have to say their teams across the board are below average. My sister’s kids played for Loudoun and it is hard to grasp their performance considering the resources (money and fields) and bloated pool of players. Just my two cents. [/quote]

Perhaps one of the great mysteries of the DMV - why isn't LS better? I have a DS who plays for them in the ULittles ages. For the fall, he developed quite a bit individually but his team did not come together as well.

He enjoys his coach and team, and is challenged. However, I have noticed the variance in the quality of coaching - quite a range from great to below average. And I'd suggest the player pool is not as deep as some suggest. Yes, there are numbers but the talent at the top end is just not as deep or good as you see at some of the other top tier clubs in CCL.

It is baffling. I'd argue for some reason the club is just much stronger on the girls side at the younger ages than boys. But there is not really a club in the area that peels off the talent at the younger ages for boys (unlike the girls where you have FCV).

[/quote]

I would argue that Loudoun is WEAKER on the girls side when it’s all said and done at U17-U19 when kids are committing to play in college.   Take the current 03 age group for example.....boys side 3 players to VT (ranked no 4), Stanford, GW, and VCU.   Girls side...Longwood and CNU.[/quote]

PP made argument stronger on girls side at younger ages. That's true. Red and black girls teams at U9-U10 dominate compared to boys side. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics