Reply to Wall Street Journal on rampant growth in percentage of college students with “disabilities”

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Wall Street Journal on rampant growth in percentage of college students with “disabilities”"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m another poster with wretched eye sight who thinks of accommodations as analogous to eyeglasses.  That said, I think time-pressured standardized tests that don’t cover material as difficult as that presented in many high schools are a poor way of evaluating/ranking kids for college.  [/quote]

Er..it isn’t. You have a choice to wear them or not. What if you weren’t given a choice while others who gamed the system were? Would u be happy? Would u think it is fair? [/quote]

You ignored  the second half of what I wrote.  I don’t think speed should be what we’re testing in this context (just as I don’t think vision is what we should be testing on a reading exam).  So I’d remove time pressure generally.  But that’s a less profitable model ....[/quote]

I think processing speed is a perfectly appropriate thing to measure for college admissions. I don't think it's the only thing that matters, but it is a legitimate metric of academic capability. [/quote]

Not within these kind of parameters or wrt these kinds of tasks.  In college, students can put in widely varying amounts of time on the same assignment.  And what’s generally being tested isn’t speed but depth of knowledge and nuance (and/or ability to bring knowledge to bear in solving a problem or understanding a situation).  Answering multiple choice questions quickly and accurately isn’t really a good measure of a student’s ability to do that kind of work.  
[/quote]

Then give everyone the same “extended” time. You can’t argue this and then argue extended time is fair. It isn’t. [/quote]

Are you willing to sit in the room for 50% more time, even if you do not need it?  For many people that would be another version of hell. [/quote]

Shouldn’t that be the kid’s choice? Why is my kid unfairly discriminated against by not being given the option of taking extra time if he/she wanted to? Who are you to tell me that DC doesn’t want it? Why should only the wealthy be allowed to game the system? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics